WorkingAs1
Executive layer view
CWA

Executive layer view

Layer 1: Institutional integrity & mission

Cross-program view of whether your stated standards hold up inside the department—what boards, donors, and regulators infer if behavior drifts from the brand you project.

Discuss this section with Marc, your AI assistant

Core value alignment

Staff alignment with program core values

Aligned
Not aligned

Team first

22%
78%

Integrity (NIL, grades, conduct)

18%
82%

Student-athlete centered

24%
76%

Competitive excellence

28%
72%

Resilience / grit

20%
80%
Discuss this section with Marc, your AI assistant

Clarity vs. conviction

Understanding vs. belief in each core value

Clarity (they get it)
Conviction (they buy it)

Team first

82%
75%

Integrity

88%
90%

Student-athlete centered

76%
70%

Competitive excellence

80%
72%

Resilience / grit

85%
78%
Executive read: Gaps spotlight where people understand the standard but don’t yet trust it’s rewarded—or vice versa.
Discuss this section with Marc, your AI assistant

Sport & unit heatmap

Core value alignment across sports / units

Team firstIntegrityStudent-athleteExcellenceResilience
Football
Very High
High
Neutral
High
Very High
Men's basketball
High
Very High
Very High
High
High
Women's basketball
Very High
High
Very High
Very High
High
Olympic sports
Neutral
Very High
High
Very High
High
Strength & performance
High
High
High
Neutral
Very High
Athletics administration
Low
Very High
Neutral
High
Very High
Very High
High
Neutral
Low
Very Low
Discuss this section with Marc, your AI assistant

Integration score

Are your pillars slogan-only or wired into how you operate?

This measures whether mission and values steer real choices—lineups, staff expectations, donor conversations, compliance discipline—or stay as wall art.

Directional

Vision & mission

78%

Behavioral

Core values & beliefs

52%

Words only (0-25)
Spotty reps (26-50)
Consistent habits (51-75)
Fully integrated (76-100)